Home
Human Liberation Alliance
FSUTO
Liberdemia
Poliveria
Valenturia
Creative Culture
Liberation Journal
Government
Courts
Security
Culture
Society
Economy
Education
Index
Table of Issues
Join the Libertocracy
Association
Volunteer
Contact
Forum
Introduction to
Libertocracy
Principles of Libertocracy
How to a Build
a Better Civilization
Free
Enterprise Government
without Taxes


Death By Government Nation-states slaughtered about 170
million people during the 20th Century
|
The
Military: Mercenary Terrorists,
The Embodiment of Evil
The origins of militarism date back to the first organized
gangs of anti-social thugs who couldn't live in cooperative societies and took up their
clubs to beat people over the head and force them to be their slaves. Violent domination
has always been the real objective of the state. Kings and later Presidents and Prime
Ministers are merely the glorified heads of gangs of thugs. These gangs of thieves,
murderers, pirates, terrorists and other scum, have, through the centuries been able to
extend their power into the economy, through regulation and taxation, and into education,
to brain wash their slaves into believing in the illusion of their legitimacy and
promoting the glorification of the national military-state as some deified entity that one
is privileged to serve. This criminal filth has gone far beyond the use of basic brute
force into the realm of mass mind control, which makes them much more dangerous than the
savages of old. The poisonous influence of militarism contaminates all of society,
inevitably degrading every single person who has any association with or provides any
support for the military, its members or institutions.
The state's main criminal business is military terrorism. The state doesn't
protect and defend individual human beings, it is at war against them; the purpose of the
military is to defend the political and economic power of those who have usurped their
authority over other people through, deception, theft and violence so that the political
mobsters will be able to continue perpetrating their crimes.
The military defends only its own criminal activity, that means that they are
willing to commit mass murder or even destroy the world rather than allow anyone to be
free of the state. All militaries are nothing but mercenary terrorists hired by the
political mob bosses to carry out their aggressions in order to defend and increase their
own political and economic power. Militaries don't defend human rights or freedom, they
wage war against them.
The purpose of war is the destruction of the enemy
including those civilians who are resources to the military-state. It is the objective of
the military to kill, to maim, to destroy as much of the enemy nation's economy,
infrastructure and civilian industries as possible and to terrorize the entire population.
They must create terror as an object lesson to convince other potential opponents to
submit on command. Therefore, the war must not only inflict maximum death and suffering on
its victims, mostly civilians because it is a primary objective to demoralize the
population so they will be ineffective slaves in support of the war effort, but it must
also broadcast its achievements as propaganda to strike fear in the hearts of other
potential targets who might defy their will.
The strategy of war is, first of all, to inflict
terror in a population so as to get them to cease their support of the regime that rules
over them or to inflict as much damage as possible on the population who are the ruler's
resources, states see peoples as merely resources or property to be enslaved and used
themselves or targets to be destroyed among the enemy. Most states don't try to kill other
rulers because their own rulers are cowards and they are afraid other rulers may try to
kill them and it also tends to undermine the power of the world system of state cartels,
therefore cowardly militaries choose terrorism as their method of achieving political and
economic goals. Military action among large modern states rarely involves the intention of
defeating an enemy political regime totally because this is too destabilizing for the
world state cartels, instead, strategic terrorism and destruction to disrupt the lives,
economy and functions of an entire country without any real intention of removing a
dictator from power is used to punish a people for supporting a certain political system
or being stupid enough to be controlled by it; and the terrorist state that wages such a
war is always doing so for their own selfish political and economic gain which comes from
disrupting and sabotaging other countries' ability to compete against them in the world
feudal system. Often military force is nothing more than a show of aggression, bullies who
are cowards that murder civilians knowing that the weak third world country they are
attacking poses no real threat to their country or even to the cowardly soldiers who
launch their missiles from the safety of the rat holes in which they cower.
States agree not to kill each other's political rulers and they negotiate
treaties for the protection of their soldiers who are prisoners of war and they usually
don't kill soldiers who are in the process of surrendering, yet these malevolent
terrorists unleash unrestrained destruction on defenseless civilians, while the captured
soldiers sit it out, often in the relative security of a prisoner of war camp, while there
is no relief for innocent people who continue to be slaughtered. When the war is over, the
politicians divide up the spoils; they usually don't remove another head of state, and
their POWs are released without facing trial for their numerous crimes. They regard the
lives of their paid terrorists as being move valuable than the lives of civilians who are
merely considered collateral garbage who's lives, if lost, are of no consequence. For the
civilians who are the victims of war there is no justice because states agree not to
prosecute or punish captured enemy soldiers and they prevent any real justice system from
bringing these criminals to justice. The criminality of war continues to be perpetrated
because there is no higher power than states who can enforce human rights law and bring
those who violate it to justice.
The threat of the use of military force, which is inevitably perpetrated against innocent
civilians, is pure terrorism. And the use of military domination to enslave the population
or to threaten to enslave the population through conscription is terrorism. Promoting,
training or preparing to wage war is the crime of conspiracy to incite or commit
terrorism.
Frequently political action is used for internal domestic political reasons. A ruler
who is unpopular or who's policies have failed or the economy is weak may try to bolster
his image and rally support from the mindless rabble citizenry by launching a terror
attack against another country. Political rulers being nothing but bullies in their own
country means that, to the barbarian mind, a ruler that appears to be weak must prove
himself strong by bombing defenseless people on the other side of the world. The
mindless drone citizens fall into line and join the war effort because they have been
totally brainwashed into the insanity of patriotic nationalism, which expresses itself in
the desire to slaughter people who are labeled as the "enemy" simply because
they are perceived to have a different artificial cultural identity.
The mercenary terrorists are cowardly in way they wage war, they spend
billions of dollars to buy weapons of mass destruction to fire at farther ranges so they
won't have to risk their own cowardly asses. They will bomb cities and murder innocent
people by the thousands rather than risk the worthless cowardly hides of even a few of
their terrorist soldiers. A gang of sub-human garbage that considers the mass murder of
millions of innocent people preferable to risking the lives of a few thousand soldiers,
who are nothing but terrorists who want to impose their rulers policies to gain political
and economic power, should be viewed as a virulent infestation on the world that threatens
humanity and must be eradicated like any other malevolent disease.
War is an extension of political policy.
Wars are fought in many ways, not only with deadly weapons, but politically, economically,
environmentally, culturally, psychologically and diplomatically. While different
strategies may be employed, all wars ultimately serve the same goal; the defense and
increase of political and economic power over people by political rulers. This insatiable
hunger for power is not only over foreign people but is primarily exercised over their own
subjects continually.
Much of the political-military policy of war is internal; war is used to
control citizens, to make them more obedient to the state and by keeping the nation in a
state of war or constant preparation for war it allows the state to assume greater
emergency powers and to intrude in areas that they haven't been able to invade previously.
To control every aspect of life, including education
and the regulation of everything into a command economy that tells people what kind of
work to do and how to do it. The demand side policy directs the economy toward the
promotion of certain types of technologies and industries that serve the military
contractors, it molds and welds the collective mob together into a union of slaves that
can be easily controlled and directed in increasing the power of the military machine.
Protesting this war against the people is not tolerated and they assume, in
the interest of national security, the slaves must be silenced, so that censorship becomes
a vital tool in mind control. Most pathetic, are the stupid slaves who continue to say how
proud they are to support the war effort; since they are coerced or forced into doing it,
they deserve credit for nothing, if they actually choose to do it, then they are
criminality culpable, and worst of all, citizen peer pressure is exerted on others to
coerce them into being obedient slaves who are supposed to put on an idiotic grin, salute
their national rag and go around spouting nationalistic jingoism in support of the evil
they are collectively perpetrating.
This action is primarily a war against the rights of the citizens who are too
stupid to realize that the greatest threat to themselves comes from their own rulers and
from their fellow mindless slaves. It is a war of total subjugation that can lead to the
ultimate tyrannical act of any state; conscription.
Some politicians realizing the benefits to be gained, engineer wars knowing
that the power to regulate the economy, control the media
and increase taxation are policies
that can be extended indefinitely as long as they continue building more powerful
militaries that continue to threaten other nations, who themselves build up their
militaries in an arms race that will inevitably lead to greater state power and to war; an
arms race is a state of war.
When the politician's modes of diplomatic and economic warfare fails, they
resort to military force to achieve their political goals. After all, the objective of
political policy, is to coerce or force their own subjects or other nations into behaving
the way in which they want, when normal policies fail to achieve this, they resort to the
political tool called war, which is used to make them behave the way the dominate state
wants them to behave; this certainly has nothing to do with defending anyone's rights.
State militaries never defend human rights, any claim to do so is a damnable lie, their
act of war in violation of the natural rights of people to live in a world free of
intentionally organized violence which is mostly directed at civilians, whether their own
subjects or a group of people perceived as, "an enemy nation", to force them to
obey the political policy of a group who wants to profit from their defeat and enslavement
-- it is the most extremely criminal act possible.
The state instills fear to get their subjects to cower together for "national defense", to get them to
surrender their freedom in exchange for a false security that results in them being
controlled and enslaved. To impose the artificial concept of nationality, the state must make other nations their
enemy so their own people will see their nationality as the embodiment of their persona,
as opposed to those "aliens" who are demonized, and that membership in their
nation, which they are told to believe is superior to all others, is necessary to their
survival as individuals who are merely pieces of the larger creature, the nation-state, on
whom they are made to be totally dependent.
War is used to glorify the state and make the simple minded imbeciles that
serve it get the satisfaction of having the power to destroy on a massive scale. Their
idiotic displays of pomp are vain-glorious productions of propaganda that impress on the
ignorant citizens, who have been subjugated and made to feel powerless, that they are
somehow connected to or supportive of this big powerful machine which seems to give an
artificial feeling of power to people who are suffering from a crisis of self-esteem. It's
the same psychological mentality as the school yard bully who feels that he has to
overcome his inferiority complex by bullying smaller children and seeking shallow
friendships from servile toadies, just like those in the military. Many of these people
don't lead lives of independent responsibility and success and have an internal hostility
toward others that comes out in joining a violent street gang or even a more violent
national gang-- the military.
Like street gangs, members of the military seek to identify with something
larger than themselves to give them the sense of power and artificial pride that they
can't get on their own, that comes from building up a massively destructive force to
intimidate the whole world, just as a street gang that gets artificial respect from
intimidating people in their neighborhood. The more civilized and truly honorable mind
gets respect by the way one treats others; with respect to other people's rights and
having the courage to live a moral life, this genuine respect is for an individual person,
not what one belongs to, or uniforms or symbols of a group.
For the military members, their only concept of honor is in promoting the
military itself and the supremacy of the state, which means supporting lies, tyranny,
terrorism and other criminality, this is what they defend and for which they kill and die;
its their religion. They know that even though they may eventually die believing only in
the secular materialism of the state, their salvation comes from being sacrificed and
worshipped like a martyr and being buried with honors from their god the state. In this
way they can be glorified over the lives of the common people (civilians), many of whom
were the hapless, defenseless victims of war they were responsible for murdering. But
these victims of war have no meaning to the worshipers of the state because they didn't
serve the state or increase it's power. The glorification of war dead, most of whom are
murders and some rapists, as if their lives are more valuable than those they murdered, is
heresy against Theius and a statement of contempt for humanity and those whom they claimed
to be defending.
Worst of all is their legacy, because of what they have done, they use this
and the power they have gained to continue to instill a reverence in the subjects for
state terrorists and use it to brainwash them into believing that past terrorists gave
them what they have today, that their rights come from slavery and mass murder. What
monumental stupidity the subjects have who believe that their inherent natural, Theius
given rights which are exercised by their own free will come from past tyranny and
criminality. What people today have been given as a legacy of militarism, the evils of
militarism; tyranny, slavery, terrorism, murder, theft, and the burden of the villainy,
not only of the political state and all of the corrupt institutions that have been
extended through history and now must be fought and destroyed, but also the legacy of the
corrupting of the morals of civilization where ignorant people are taught to worship evil
and have contempt for those who would live free and responsible lives in service to
humanity, and would truly defend human rights. This legacy is what has been left to
people, yes, the tyranny of the state that we have today is a result of what the
militaries of the past have done.
The real heroes are the people who have the moral courage to do what is right
in the face of war. Those who risk their lives to actually defend innocent people, to
rescue refugees, to treat the casualties or those who attack and kill only the enemy
soldiers or assassinate political rulers; the real heroes are also the war protesters,
resisters and pacifists and others who did everything within their power, sometimes giving
their lives in the cause of trying to prevent war or undermining the war effort. Anything
that weakens the military-state is a great service to humanity. The only soldiers who are
heroes in war are from private militias, revolutionary forces, freedom fighters and a few
renegades from the state military who actually defend innocent people by fighting and
killing other soldiers who are attacking civilians, and those soldiers who are most
effective are those who go after the head of the monster, those who kill high ranking
military-state officials. But the most morally heroic are the non-combatants who take the
highest moral ground and defend it non-violently no matter what the consequences and risk
their lives to help people. These real heroes are not only overlooked, they are often
ridiculed by the mercenary terrorists because they fear these people more than any others,
because they are a real threat to the survival of their institutions, and because these
people act on the higher principles of moral courage and honor that the militarists don't
even understand.
The real heroes are also those who maintain their families and continue to
lead responsible lives and help each other under the worst of conditions and continue to
be decent and civilized and not participate in the war frenzy of murder and concomitant
theft and other crimes.
As I have said, not all soldiers are villains, in the past, many men have
fought in wars, not necessarily to defend the tyranny of the state, but to defend their
families and communities against tyranny and aggression and to defend human rights against
an enemy who is committing atrocities against innocent people. Many of these soldiers, as
in the American Revolution, have fought courageously and honorably strictly against other
enemy soldiers who are waging wars against innocent people. Those soldiers who did only
fight and kill enemy soldiers are not villains, but are heroes, if it is really in defense
of innocent people. If groups of individuals fight and kill each other merely for personal
glory and don't put innocent people at risk, then they are neither heroes nor villains,
they are merely barbaric animals who slaughter each other. Even in wars waged by the state
where they have a political objective, men who have joined these wars for the honest
reason of defending human rights are justified in their service to humanity if they have
the courage and character to keep their fight honorable by respecting human rights law and
not killing civilians.
But these are the actions of individuals, the fact remains that the military
is a political instrument used by the state to wage wars against human rights, and while
individuals are sometimes powerless and have to make moral decisions to protect those
closest to them, in no way can the military or the state itself be justified. Even if they
claim to defend their own "nation", because
in doing so they are destroying individuals in other nations. In reality there is no such
thing as "national defense", nations are artificial cultural concepts with which
people identify; human rights is not based on nationality, the only legitimate use of
force is the defense of individual human rights. What they call "national
defense" is defense of the political cartel, they're not defending the individuals of
the nation, they're violating their rights in defense of the tyranny placed over them. So,
for a man to be honorable, he must fight, not for himself or selfish political reasons,
but for innocent people, for women and children and the rights of humanity without
considering himself a servant of the military-state. To commit oneself to serving the
military-state is to become a political terrorist.
The military doesn't defend individual rights, it doesn't even defend nations
of people, it is a murdering terrorist war machine designed only to increase the power of
the state, the military is the enemy of individual rights, the enemy of the family, the
enemy of all nations and civilization itself.
Mercenary terrorists are without moral courage or honor, they commit armed
robbery and murder and use politics as the excuse for it. Terrorists are not heroes. The
idea of glorifying these malevolent demons is a disgrace to the mob of people who call
themselves a "nation". Their constantly attaching ideas such as honor and glory
to everything connected to the military is the most transparent and artificial form up
propaganda. The military lacks the moral courage to put their own worthless hides on the
line to defend the lives of innocent people, not only do they not defend freedom, they
wage a war against it.
During this century more children have died in wars than have soldiers, this
is the strongest condemnation of all militaries and the clearest example of the cowardice
exhibited by these terrorists. Their strategy almost always involves putting themselves at
the least possible risk while slaughtering innocent people to accomplish their goals.
Usually they refuse to actually go after an enemy, instead they hide in their rat holes,
and launch weapons of mass destruction from their bunkers or aboard ships over a hundred
miles from shore which places only a minimal risk on themselves, but results in the mass
murder of thousands of civilians. They say their objective in doing this is that they hope
to hit a military target, and what they call "collateral damage" (mass murder of
innocent people) is just an unfortunate necessity. It is only a necessity because these
terrorist bastards are cowards; physical and moral cowards. They have absolutely no
concept of morality since it has been perverted through their training into whatever
serves their ruler's interests. Their concept of honor is absurd, to them honor is
whatever they say it is just because they have the power to enforce it. Honor guards,
tradition of honor, honor in the corps, all of these are false hollow slogans, there is no
honor in cowardly terrorism, least of all an honor that comes from an assumption made
through the enslavement of a people who are forced at the point of a gun to support them
and pay homage to them.
These parasites are living off of the productive lives of other people, many
military members are kids trying to get honest working people to pay for their college
education or they have joined because they couldn't get a job in the real economy, others
are hard core terrorists. These people are bloodsucking leeches living off of military
welfare. This welfare doesn't stop with the term of their membership, but continues
throughout their lives with many special benefits, pensions and perks forcibly paid for by
others.
War is big business, many corporations are dependent on the military to sell
their products. Weapons manufacturers are all too willing to sell weapons to anyone,
including both sides in a war. The more wars there are, the more killing , the more they
sell, and many of the merchants of death lobby their own politicians to support or even
subsidize weapons sales all over the world, thus the state does its part to spread
conflict everywhere, by making war or just selling weapons to other countries, sometimes
even to their enemies, and later own have their own soldiers killed by weapons made in
their own country; what madness!
Because all wars are useful to the state, they support wars against everything; a war
against drugs (a.k.a.: war against individual rights), war against poverty, war against
teen pregnancy, war against the budget deficit, war against obesity, war against tobacco,
war against pornography, if they can make it unpopular, they can exploit it by declaring
war against it. A war is by definition an abandonment of honor and morality, its the
destruction of an enemy at all costs, a complete disregard for the rights of people and
anyone who gets in the way, to win a war means removing everything that stands in the way
of having the absolute power to wage the war, and that means violating people's rights in
order to have absolute power, that is the purpose of wars; to dominate people and
territory and thereby get absolute power over them. Therefor all wars are inherently evil.
The clearest evidence of this is the war on drugs which has turned into concomitant war on
free speech, war on privacy, war on property and other civil rights, with constitutional
protections being the first enemy to defeat.
Those internal wars waged in the cause of a political objective have achieved
what they set out to do; get absolute power for the state over individuals. Of course they
haven't solved any of the problems they started out to solve, but no war ever solved
anything, wars just destroy lives and property and get more power for the state, all of
those problems have only gotten worse, and of course the evil tyrants tell their stupid
subjects that the reason the problems aren't being solved is that the government needs
more money and more power and that the people may have to give up more of their rights so
they can win the war. Fools, the war is against your rights!
If they really wanted to solve those problems, the right way of doing it is
detailed in Solving
Society's Problems, but they aren't really serious about protecting people from those
problems anymore than they are about protecting their rights, they are only exploiting and
using those problems to get more power for themselves.
After all; a war on drugs is not really a war on inanimate substances, it's a
war against the right of individuals to put what they want into their own bodies by
attacking and imprisoning or killing people who have moral, emotional or medical problems
that have lead them into drug use. A war on poverty involves armed robbery and
redistribution of incomes into socialist policies that create dependency, undermine
individual initiative and responsibility and destroy families. A war on the deficit is
theft of more personal income because the mobsters have spent money they haven't yet been
able to steal. A war on pornography violates the fundamental human right to freedom of
sexual expression with other consenting adults.
War is the ultimate crime against humanity, since the primary goal of war is to declare an
entire people the enemy and set out to destroy them by any means, usually in the most
cowardly way.
War can exist only where there is no effective law, war is the absence of law, it's an
attack on the very concept of justice and civilization itself.
You can't wage war in the name of freedom and justice because war destroys the
possibility of the enjoyment of them. You can't wage war to impose a nationality on people against their will or to commit
atrocities and expect to have justice afterward, good can't come from evil. You can't have
a civilized or just society because the foundations have been destroyed.
The foundations of a civilized society are built on respecting everyone's sovereign rights
regardless of nationality and by maintaining peace.
The soulless mercenary terrorists like to say that freedom isn't free.
When they talk about the military fighting for freedom they mean that they are fighting
for the license of their political masters to impose their tyranny and get away with their
many terrorist crimes. The rulers are only able to perpetrate their crimes because of
their paid thugs and then they tell the stupid slaves to be grateful to the thugs who are
responsible for enslaving them; that is most humiliating.
It's a totally cynical and arrogant view of humanity that they think that
people are so stupid as to continue believing that enslaving a people and forcing them to
support terrorism to gain more power for the rulers to continue to violate the sovereign
rights of human beings is defense of freedom.
Their national defense, is the defense of their criminal terrorist
organization, it is the defense of the political mobsters power over the people and their
control of the economy and other institutions, it is the defense of evil. The
military-statists are the primary enemies of individual freedom, they fear freedom and use
their power to deny its exercise in every way possible.
Now this brief time out for a message to all members of the military and their
supporters;
"My freedom comes from Theius created nature and my own free will, you sons of a
bitches, and don't you ever forget it".
The price of freedom is
personal responsibility and accountability in living freely as a sovereign individual and
respecting other peoples' right to the same freedom, the price of freedom is practicing free self-government and the price of freedom is tolerating
other people doing things they have a right to do but that you don't like, the price of
freedom is living freely, self-sufficiently and responsibly. Obviously that is a price
that the mercenary terrorists are unwilling to pay.
These unconscionable manipulators brainwash their slaves into thinking that
their right to exist and exercise their mind and abilities comes from the fact that a gang
of terrorists once mass murdered millions of innocent people in other nations and that the
opportunities they have come from the theft and intrusions of the state defended by the
military, any people who are so stupid as to believe this deserve their slavery and all
other exploitations perpetrated against them.
Throughout much of history the military was
used to fight for the policies of the King and the religious doctrines of the church. In
many countries the dominate racial-ethnic group use the police/military as an exercise in
power to oppress minority groups.
Now the androgynous
communists use the police/military to wage a war against the natural family and attack
the rights of women by
involving males and females in combat training and in combat against each other. The
effect of this is that the mercenary terrorist filth now views females as combatants and
this puts women's rights and lives at danger all over the world. Only the most perverted
excuse for sub-human animals would do this, only the most barbaric of countries would
actually promote such extreme perversion of humanity, and as with Nazis and Communists,
those regimes who are waging a war against humanity and threatening the very definition of
what it means to be human, must be destroyed and eradicated from this world at all costs.
This is because these evil regimes coerce or force males and females in combat against
each other, or they steal people's money and force them to support this war against the
human family and they provide no opportunity for decent civilized men and women to be able
to protect and defend their rights according to natural sex roles.
Any people who actually promote combative behavior between the sexes are the
most degenerate form of sub-human scum that have ever crawled on this earth. They are
trying to set back human evolution to a level lower than the most primitive primates. Combative behavior between the sexes is absolutely morally wrong,
it is uncivilized, it contributes to a culture where the moral relationships between the
sexes, where men's and women's rights and roles within the family and society are
persecuted and denied the opportunity for full expression. It encourages violence against
women that results in increased
domestic abuse and more common verbal and physical attacks against women in society.
The worst effect of all is that it poses a real threat
to females everywhere, throughout history men who fight in wars were supposed to attack
only the enemy men, at least there was a prohibition of honor to not kill women and
children. If men will commit violence against women in training, then they can be counted
on to kill women and children in war. A country that puts women in combat poses a threat
to women and children all over the world, such a country must be destroyed for the future
of humanity.
In Bosnia and Kosovo men and teenage boys where rounded up by enemy
forces and shot, in Bosnia they put in concentration camps where they were starved while
summarily shot. There were these reports of whole villages of males being taken away and
never seen again. The reason for this was to keep them from joining their own armed forces
and fighting in the war. While females where killed and systematically raped, there wasn't
the systematic rounding up of females to be shot because they weren't viewed as potential
combatants, they were viewed as sexual prey. That's why most women survived the war and
many men did not, there were the pictures everyday of mostly women and children refugees
coming out of Kosovo. If there had been a policy to have women in combat, those women and
children would not have survived, they would have been systematically killed. In other
wars throughout history conquering armies have slaughtered all of the men and boys and
taken the females captive, many were made slaves, some married their conquerors, many
others were freed into the conquering society because they were not seen as a threat to
the rulers. Any female has a right to fight to defend herself against any harm and any
female who does so is acting as an individual, that does not in endanger females in
general, its only when a country has a policy of putting women in combat that it threatens
the lives of all females, everywhere.
They are so committed to the perversion of humanity that, for the amazon
women, who are not qualified for combat because they don't have the strength or other
athletic abilities needed to even survive in combat, much less win, they use double
standard cheating; where men have to perform up to a higher standard, but women only have
to perform down to a lower standard to be considered qualified. Anyone who objects to this
fraud is immediately punished or discharged.
The castrated males who are only a pitiful excuse for a men go along with it
like whipped dogs, and by doing so participate in the war against the rights and lives of
their own wives, mothers, sisters and daughters by denying their rights to participate in
their government and security services in their own feminine way. Some of the
bastards even abuse their daughters to such an extreme that it perverts the girl's
behavior to a degree that she feels that the only way to get her father's respect is to
become a mercenary terrorist just like him, even many members of the Mafia aren't that
evil. The exercise in masculine dominance over women is where the discrimination lies, the
feminazis haven't changed the culture at all, they have only joined into the discriminatory oppression against women's rights.
Women in combat certainly will result in the deaths or
men soldiers, because the women are obviously are not physically able to perform at a
sufficient level to make a strong enough team, because soldiers fight as a unit who is
only as strong as its weakest link. Just one woman in a combat unit may cause the deaths
of the entire unit because she is not up to the equal physical standards of the men. The
androgynists who promote this madness, don't even care about the lives of the men and
women in the military, much less are they actually serious about having the most qualified
soldiers, this policy is not about defending anyone, its about promoting androgynism by
ignoring physical differences between the sexes. The way they get away with it is by lying
and cheating; by having double standards where they require less of the women, and then
call the outcome more or less equal.
Women in combat will inevitably be captured and raped, if you choose to put
women in combat this will eventually happen. Many of the women in the military are
mentally ill, they have serious emotional problems they are trying to overcome in a
misguide way, many were abused by their fathers and are trying prove that they are just as
good as the son he always wanted, any woman who would want to be in combat is obviously
insane. Anyone who actually believes that women are physically qualified for combat is
crazy; this policy is madness. Would the NFL institute a gender quota system to put
women on every team? Only the most perverted communistic countries would do such a
barbaric, inhuman thing.
Militarism is more evil than just the acts of violence, in that its poisonous
influence on society is the antithesis of a civilized society and the effect of males and
females in combat on the family and relations within the larger society is one of the most
extreme perversions of human behavior that any country has ever perpetrated, and may be
considered to be the greatest threat to the future of humanity. These subhuman animals
that are a part of this are completely unfit to live among decent civilized human beings.
These pernicious creatures are not fit to be allowed to be around children much less to
actually raise them, because any exposure of these horrors to children is certainly
abusive and corrupting of their morals.
War degrades and corrupts all of society, it is the triumph of criminal values,
lawlessness, barbarism and it poisons the soul and destroys the ability of a society to be
just.
Since the militarists seek to constantly popularize their terrorist organization, they
use the media, and the corporations
who have an interest in the defense industry to promote the military and to encourage
aggression, belligerency and acceptance of state organized terrorist activity. As many
corporations are military contractors, these fiends see an interest in promoting violence to children to encourage belligerent
behavior so that they may be more likely to support that type of behavior in the state and
so that they may be more likely to join the mercenary terrorists when they grow up. The
promotion of a bellicose lexicon
throughout the culture helps to get people thinking that the warlike mentality is all
pervasive and is necessary to the functioning of civilization.
Slavery
Of all of the countless crimes committed by militaries the most truly evil is
conscription. A physical act of violence, such as war against innocent victims harms the
persons who are the victims, but the guilt for the act is entirely on the perpetrator, the
victim remains innocent and is not corrupted in one's soul by the act, unless one allows
oneself to be. But conscription, whether directly into the military or into the labor
force to serve the war effort, is the mass corruption of an entire population. It makes
all persons who participate in it guilty of contributing to the war and its many
atrocities. The political engineers of this crime, degrade every quality of a decent
society by turning their energies toward the service of unrepentant evil. The militarist
vermin corrupts the morals of children by trying to militarize their behavior and
attitudes.
Only the most cowardly and pernicious of countries would resort to enslaving
their own children, family members, friends and neighbors to force them into the worst
form of slavery possible, to force them to commit horrendous crimes for their selfish
nationalist political interests.
Anyone who would raise children within a society where they support a
villainous mob that would enslave their children and lead them to their deaths or even
worse, turn them into monstrous terrorists are the vilest most damnable excuse for a human
being, it would be more merciful for them to kill their children before reaching adulthood
and save their souls from the corrupting damnation of becoming a terrorist.
Any country that would resort to slavery to force their subjects to commit
atrocities against humanity in order to defend the power of a pernicious mob to continue
enslaving and committing crimes against their own people as well as others is a cancerous
scourge on the world and must be totally eradicated using whatever means necessary.
No country that has to force its citizens to defend it can justify its own existence.
The cowardly politicians don't have the courage to do what they have to do, to kill
dictators both foreign and domestic who are waging wars against human rights.
The politicians won't risk their own lives for the causes in which they wage wars, but
they will to force others to fight for them, wars fought by cowards for cowards.
The politicians won't even challenge other rulers or their representatives to combat duels.
Politicians declaring that no head of state should be assassinated even
during times of war is saying that they would rather mass murder people by the millions
and enslave their own people rather than prevent war. It means they choose war. To kill
another head of state threatens the cowardly mobsters that rule their own state, it's
easier for those in power to enslave their own people and turn them into terrorist
murders; to degrade and destroy the morality and honor of the people to pervert human
behavior and send them to their deaths, rather than the cowards willing to risk their own
lives to do their duty to humanity to prevent war by killing those who start wars.
Any honorable
defense force has a moral obligation to risk their own lives to defend the lives of
innocent people at all costs, they have a duty to fight and destroy those who are waging the war by
killing the political rulers, members of the political command structure and extensively
slaughtering the state's police and military. They must have the strength, fighting
ability and courage to fight these enemies and kill them without killing innocent people.
One strategy for accomplishing this is Dienforcade.
The statists commit terrorism to promote the selfish interests of their nation and its
political cartel. Legitimate government is
based on the protection of universal human rights, people's nationality is irrelevant to legitimate government, nationality is strictly a private
matter. Those who fight wars to impose or promote a nationality are criminals against
humanity who are waging a war against the right of human beings to choose their own
nationality under a government that defends human freedom.
All wars are the same war, they are all fighting for political and economic power and
dominance.
You cannot organize people into a military-state and expect the result to be justice or
have reason prevail in the direction of human actions.
Militarism corrupts all of society, the militarists promote and train children in violence to recruit future
terrorists, the culture they develop is bellicose, anti-family, anti-human rights and
anti-freedom. As long as people continue to support the military-state, they will be
supporting a war against human rights, a war against freedom
and a war against the family and their own children. People are shocked at the level of violence among
kids, this culture of death and youth violence is no accident, it was developed over a
long period of time by the militarists. If people want to save their children, their
family and to protect the rights and quality of life for the people of their own country
and all of humanity, they must oppose militarism.
The military mercenary terrorists are so extreme in their abandonment of human morality
that reform of this evil institution is impossible, the only cure for militarism is its
total destruction.
People must choose which side they are on, either; on the side of peace or war, on the
side of humanity or its enemies, on the side of good or evil.
--Libertocracy; Aug., 2000
by Libercratus
Quotes about the Military and War
"We do not fight for the real but for the shadows we make, a flag is a piece of
cloth and a word is a sound. But we make them something neither cloth nor a sound, totems
of love and hate, black sorcery-stones." Stephen Vincent Benet, (John Brown's
Body)
"War is a continuation of policy by other means. It is not merely a political act
but a real political instrument." Karl von Clausewitz, (War, Politics and Power)
"For what are the triumphs of war, planned ambition, executed by violence, and
consummated by devastation? The means are the sacrifice of many, the end, the bloated
aggrandizement of the few."
Charles Caleb Colton, (Lacon)
"The most shocking fact about war is that its victims and its instruments are
individual human beings, and that these individual beings are condemned by the monsterous
conventions of politics to murder or be murdered in quarrels not their own." - Aldous
Huxley, (The Olive Tree)
"We kill because we're afraid of our own shadows, afraid that if we used a little
common sense we'd have to admit that our glorious principles were wrong." Henry
Miller (The Wisdom of the Heart)
"War is both the product of an earlier corruption and a producer up new
corruptions."
Louis Mumford, (The Conduct of Life)
"He who is the author of war lets loose the whole contention of hell and opens a
vein that bleeds a nation to death." - Thomas Paine, (The American Crisis)
"The pitifulest thing out is a mob; that's what an army is - a mob; they don't
fight with courage that's born in them, but with courage that's borrowed from their mass,
and from their officers."
Mark
Twain, (The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn)
"Every sacrifice in the name of war is wasted." - Robert Sherwood
Someone once said; "Abide no wars of prohibition against internal vices, for all
wars are engines of despotism." I think it was Abe Lincoln
"The military class is the most highly honored. And what is war, what is required
for success in warfare, what are the moral standards of the military world? The aim of war
is murder; the implements of warfare--espionage, treachery, and the inducements hereto,
the ruination of a country's inhabitants by ravage and robbery to provision the army, the
trickery and deceit known as military stratagems; the ethics of the military class--lack
of freedom, in other words, discipline, idleness, ignorance, cruelty, debauchery and
drunkenness. Yet in spite of all this, it is the highest class, respected by all." - Leo
Tolstoy (War and Peace; Book 3, Part 2, Chap. 25).
"What inducement has the farmer while following his
plow, to lay aside his peaceful pursuit and go to war with the farmer of another country?
Or what inducement has the manufacturer? And are not the conquest and defeat each of the
same price, and taxes the never failing consequence? War is the gambling table of power,
and citizens the dupes of the game." - Thomas Paine, 1792
"war is the health of the state" - Randolph Bourne
"of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded,
because it comprises and develops the germ of every other" - James Madison
"War has all the characteristics of socialism most conservatives hate: Centralized
power, state planning, false rationalism, restricted liberties, foolish optimism about
intended results, and blindness to unintended secondary results." - Joseph Sobran
(1991)
"There never was a good war or a bad peace." - Benjamin Franklin (1773)
"A government that has a permanent standing army at its disposal will always be
tempted to use it, and use it in an aggressive, interventionist, and warlike manner...Any
standing army... poses a standing threat to liberty." - Murray Rothbard; For a
New Liberty: p. 82-83
Copyright © 1999-2000 (4999-5000) Libertocracy© Association. All rights reserved. |