Human Rights
Individual Sovereignty
   Life
   Abortion
   Body

Free Speech
   Political Correctness
   Hate Crimes

Civil Rights
   Ethnic Relations
   Discrimination
   Sexual Harassment 

Body
   Drug War
Social
Family
   Parents
Male/Female Relations
   Alternative Lifestyles
          Social Perversion

Women
Men
Children
Sexuality

   Relationships
         Marriage
   Sexual Persecution
   Adult Entertainment
   Prostitution

Government
Free Country Projects
The State
   Politics
Constitution
Law
Courts

   Jury Nullification
   Litigation

Security Services
   Private Police
   Prisons
   Freedom Defense

Self Defense
   Guns
Police
Military/War

International Policy
   Travel
   Immigration
   Foreign Aid

Culture
National Liberation
Community Assoc.
Cultural Development
Media
   Broadcasting

Entertainment
   Sports
Medicine
Education

Reform

School Choice
Homeschooling

Religion
Separation

Imposition of...
Persecution of...

Property Rights
Zoning
Seizures
Public Property
Intellectual

Economy
Anti-Trust/Competition
Consumer Protection
Electronic Commerce
Business

   Gambling

Taxes
Social Security
Licensing, Permits

Regulation
Privatization
International Trade
Banking/Money
Labor
Welfare

Poverty
Transportation

   Road Privatization
   Shipping
   Air

Utilities
   Energy
   Water
   Waste Disposal

Science
Technology
Environment
Privacy

Encryption

CONSENSUS DECISION MAKING MODEL

Consensus - A feeling of agreement. Originally - the harmonious working together of parts of the body. A consensus decision is a "hammered-out" decision, where everyone is permitted a say. After discussion, give and take, and compromise has occurred, consensus is reached when everyone can honestly say, "I am willing to support and implement this decision. It may not be exactly what I personally want, but given the range of opinions, the time factor, and the personalities involved, it is a good, working decision." Consensus decision making involves a cooperative effort to find a sound solutions acceptable to everyone rather than a competitive struggle in which an unacceptable solution is forced on the losers. With consensus as a pattern of decision making and interaction, group members need not fear being outsmarted or outmaneuvered. They can be frank, candid, and authentic in their interaction at all steps in the decision making process. The process of arriving at consensus is a free and open exchange of ideas which continues until agreement is reached. A sound consensus process assures that each individual’s concerns are heard, and a sincere attempt has been made to take them into consideration in the search for and the formulation of a conclusion. This conclusion may not reflect the exact wishes of each member, but since it does not violate the deep concerns of any, it can be agreed to by all.

To achieve real consensus, rather than the illusion of it, requires skill in straight communication and working through differences. The following communication guidelines assist in coming to consensus:

  1. Take responsibility for what you want and do not want. Be specific about who you want it from.
  2. Make your interests known; what you think, want, or feel.
  3. Do not hide behind questions.
  4. Respond to others; do not leave them hanging with a "Plop."
  5. Talk to, not about a person.
  6. Listen to feelings and try feeding them back.
  7. Check out assumptions; do not "mind read."
  8. Avoid "chicken soup," smoothing over problems.
  9. If you strongly disagree with another person’s point of view, restate it before offering your own.

McCarthy and Company Organization Consultant, Inc. West Linn, Oregon

A RATIONAL AND SYSTEMATIC MODEL

This approach to solving problems in groups is an excellent guide for discussion. The model is an effective summary of several sociological methods of group decision making and problem solving. Following are the rational steps to solving a problem in a group:

  1. 1. Define and Limit the Problem
    1. Define the problem specifically, try to phrase it as a question.
    2. Discuss the group’s goals, and determine the importance of the issue to the group.
    3. Identify the group’s available resources, as well as its constraints.
  2. 2. Analyze the Problem and Gather Information
    1. Research the history and causes of the problem.
    2. Discuss how the problem relates to other issues with which the group is concerned.
    3. Collect and discuss relevant information.
    4. Challenge the group’s facts and assumptions.
  3. 3. Establish Decision Criteria (what will make a decision acceptable?)
    1. Decide what and ideal decision would look like.
    2. Discuss what a reasonable, less-than-ideal decision would look like.
  4. 4. Discuss Possible Solutions
    1. Use brainstorming techniques to produce ideas.
    2. Consider all possible solutions
    3. Identify evidence in support of and against each alternative.
  5. 5. Determine the Best Solution
    1. Does the solution minimize the problem?
    2. Does the solution fit the decision criteria?
    3. Is it consistent with the facts and information gathered?
  6. 6. Determine How the Final Decision Should Be Implemented

This material adapted from: Fisher, B. Aubrey. Small Group Decision Making. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1990.

Join the Human Liberation Alliance

Human Liberation Alliance Home